Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Calcium, phosphor and alkaline phospatase value in bone graft calsium sulfat hemihydrate bioceramic application on animal bone defect (In Vivo Study)

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine differences in the value of calcium, phosphor, and alkaline phosphatase in the blood of bone graft material which is applied to bone defectsMethods: 12 male rabbits were divided into 4 groups, then defects were made in the femur bone with a diameter of 5mm. then each group was drawn with a vulnerable blood pre-operative time, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks after surgery.Result: Average levels of calcium, alkaline phosphate and phosphorus in all treatment groups were higher than those in the control group.Conclusion: There were differences in calcium levels in test animals using bone graft α-calcium sulphate hemihydrates bioceramic on days 7th, 21st, and 42nd post surgery.
Section

References

  1. Nemcovsky CE. Clinical evaluation of particulate allogeneic with and without autogenous bone grafts and resorbable collagen membranes for bone augmentation of atrophic alveolar ridges. 2010:1242-1250. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01936.x.
  2. Ezirganli S, Kazancioglu HO, Mihmanli A, Sharifov R, Aydin MS. Effects of different biomaterials on augmented bone volume resorptions. 2014:1482-1488. doi:10.1111/clr.12495.
  3. Markel DC, Guthrie ST, Wu B. Characterization of the inflammatory response to four commercial bone graft substitutes using a murine biocompatibility model. 2012:13-18.
  4. C YK, Nalini KB, Menon J, Patro DK, Banerji BH. Calcium Sulfate as Bone Graft Substitute in the Treatment of Osseous Bone Defects , A Prospective Study. 2013;7(12):2926-2928. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/6404.3791.
  5. Hsu HJ, Waris RA, Ruslin M, Lin YH, Chen CS, Ou KL. An innovative α-calcium sulfate hemihydrate bioceramic as a potential bone graft substitute. J Am Ceram Soc. 2018;101(1):419-427. doi:10.1111/jace.15181.
  6. Adytha A. SEL PUNCA PULPA GIGI ( DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS ENZIM ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ) SEL PUNCA DENTAL PULPA ( DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS ENZIM ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE ). 2012
  7. Saraswathy G, Sastry T.P, Pal S., Sreenu Makeena, Kumar R.V.S. A new bio-inorganic composite as bone grafting material: in vivo study. Trends Biomater. Artif.Organs 2004; Vol.17(2): 37-42.
  8. Mishra Ruchi, Raina D.B., and Kumar Ashok. Study of in vitro and in vivo bone formation in composite cryogels and the influence of electrical stimulation. Int J Biol Sci 2015; 11(11): 1325-1336.
  9. Xie Minli, Olderoy Magnus, Zhang Zhibing, Andreassen Petter Jens, Strand Berit L, and Siroski Pawel. Biocomposites prepared by alkaline hosphatase mediated mineralization of alginate microbeads. RSC Adv 2012; 2: 1457-1465.
  10. Bonjour JP. Calcium and phosphate: a duet of ions playing for bone health. J Am Coll Nutr 2011; 30(5): 438-448.
  11. Mao Keya, Zhou Feihu, Cui Fuzai, Li Jiangtao, Hou Xijun, Li Peng, Du Mingkui, et al. Preparation and properties of α-calcium sulphate hemihydrates and β-tricalcium phosphate bone substitute. Bio-Med Mat Eng 2013; 23: 197-210.
  12. Chen C, Zhu C, Hu X, Yu Q, Zheng Q, Tao S, and Fan L. α-hemihydrate calcium sulphate/pctacalcium phosphate combine with sodium hyaluronate promotes bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis in vitro and in vivo. J Drug Design Dev Therapy 2018; 12: 3269-3287.
  13. Xiang Haibo,Wang Yu, Chang Hong, Yang Shenyu, Tu Mei, Zhang Xianrong, and Yu Bin. Cerium-containing α-calcium sulphate hemihydrate bone substitute promotes osteogenesis. J Biomat App 2019; 34(2): 250-260.
  14. Liu Zhi, Yu Zewei, Chang Hong, Wang Yu, Xiang Haibo, Zhang Xianrong, Yu Bin. Strontium-containing α-calcium sulphate hemihydrate promotes bone repair via the TGF-β/smad signalling pathway. Mol Med Rep 2019; 20: 3555-3564.

How to Cite

Thalib, B., Utama, M. D., Machmud, E., Asmawati, A., Winarto, S., & Intang, N. (2019). Calcium, phosphor and alkaline phospatase value in bone graft calsium sulfat hemihydrate bioceramic application on animal bone defect (In Vivo Study). Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 4(3), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v4i3.1021

HTML
299

Total
395

Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>