Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Optimalisasi radiografi gigi konvensional untuk membantu pemasangan implan gigi


Radiography as diagnostic tool is essential for treatment plan of implant. Manytechniques used to produce radiography are recommended to support the dentist inaccessing area of implantation. Many implant experts use panoramic radiography asguidelines of jaw bone evaluation as recommended by implant procedures. In orderto get optimal measurement, occlusal radiography technique can be added to evaluatethe bone thickness.panoramic and periapical radiography can solely evaluate thewidth and height of jaw bone. This study proposed to evaluate parametric value, aswidth, height, and thickness of jaw bone by conventional dental diagnosticradiography. This was observational study, with cross sectional design. Samples werechosen as population target that fulfilled samples criteria. Number of samples were 30and and analyzed using the SPSS program for Windows 14.0 and T-test. In this study,it can be concluded that there was significant difference before and after conversion ofall parametric radiography conventional tooth on jaw bone.


  1. Anil S. A Method of gauging dental radiographs during treatment planning for dental impalnts. J Contemp Dent Prac 2007; 8(6): 1-3.
  2. Fundament of dental radiology. [serial online]2006; [1 screen]; Available from: Accesed: September 21, 2008.
  3. Lee JS, Kang BC. Screening panoramic radiographs in a group of patients visiting a health promotion center. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2005; 35: 199-202.
  4. Kantor ML, Slome BA. Efficacy of panoramic radiography in dental diagnosis and treatment planning. Available from: Accesed: September 21, 2008.
  5. Block M, Kent J, Guerra L. Implants in dentistry: Essential of endosseous implant for maxillofacial reconstruction. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1997. p.74-147.
  6. Misch CE. Contemporary impant dentisrty. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p.73-118.
  7. Elsubehi ES, Attard N, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontics for edentulous patients: currents and future directions. In: Zarb GA, Bolender CL, editors. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patiens complete dentures and implant-supported protheses. 12th
  8. ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2004. p.528-38.
  9. Nevins M, Mellonig JT. Implant therapy clinical approach and evidence of success. Illinois: Quintessence; 1998.
  10. Niedermeier W. Dental implan failure and allergic reaction IADR implant prosthodontic & materials. Brisbane; 2006.
  11. White SC, Pharaoh MJ. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004. p.71-209.
  12. Mupparapu M, Sinner SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70(1):32.Barunawaty: Optimalisasi radiografi gigi konvensional17
  13. Dantas JA, Fhilo AM, Campos PSF. Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and
  14. mandibular positioning on the bone height and width. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 2.
  15. Sulle HH, Machmud E. Restorasi implan sistem bone-lock. J Medika Nusantara 2004;5(1). Available from Accesed October 10, 2008.
  16. Adipatria A, Mastuti I, Sejati IR. Kegagalan perawatan implan. Available from http://Images.bahasajiwa.multiplycom/attachment/0/SEIJfgoKCoEAAEutSEc1/kegagalan%20perawatan%implan.ppt?nmid=98824365.Accesed October 10, 2008.
  17. Implan dental. Available from Accesed
  18. October10.
  19. Priaminiarti M. Prosedur operasional baku pemeriksaan radiografik pada perawatan implan gigi. Jakarta: Departemen Radiologi
  20. Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia; 2008. hal. 1-14.
  21. Adell R. Long-term treatment results. In: Branemark P-1, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-integreted protheses osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1985. p.175-86.
  22. James R, Altman A, Clem D, Alozada J. Critical review of the osseointegreted literature. Int J Oral implantol 1986; 3(3): 3541.
  23. Kucey BKS. Implant placement in prosthodontics practice: a five-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 7: 171-6.
  24. Gaucher H. Bentley K, Roy S, Head T, Blomfield J, Blondeau F, et al. A Multi-centre study of osseotite implants supporting mandibular restoration: A 3-year report. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67(9): 528-83.
  25. Mason R. A guide to dental radiography. Bristol: John Wright and Sons Limited; 1997. p. 20-35.
  26. Eselmen JCWJ, Updegrave, Archer WH. Panoramic radiographs and localization. Oral Maxillofacial surgery, Vol 15th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1975. p.9821011.
  27. Gibiliso JA, Turlington EG., Del Van Grevenhof. Radiography techniques. Stafne’s oral radiographic diagnosis. 5 ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.; 1985: 41043.
  28. Informasi diagnostik maksimal dari radiografi. Available from: Diakses tanggal 3 Desember 2008.
  29. De Lyre WR, Johnson ON. Essential of dental radiography for dental assistants and hygienist, 4th ed. Connecticut: Appleton & Lange; 1990.
  30. p.319-28.

How to Cite

Yunus, B. (2009). Optimalisasi radiografi gigi konvensional untuk membantu pemasangan implan gigi. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 8(1), 11–17.




Search Panel

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>