Original Article

Hubungan antara derajat konveksitas profil jaringan keras dan jaringan lunak wajah pada suku Bugis dan Makassar

Susilowati Susilowati

Susilowati Susilowati
Bagian Ortodonsia Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar, Indonesia. Email: susmudjari@indosat.co.id
Online First: December 13, 2016 | Cite this Article
Susilowati, S. 2016. Hubungan antara derajat konveksitas profil jaringan keras dan jaringan lunak wajah pada suku Bugis dan Makassar. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 8(2): 125-130. ##plugins.citationFormats.apa.retrieved##


One of the orthodontic treatment goals is to correct malocclusion in order to get a
healthy occlusion functionally and esthetically. Facial esthetics is greatly influenced
by soft tissue facial profile. The aim of the study was to know the relationship between
the convexity degree of skeletal and soft tissue facial profiles. A sample of 50
cephalometric radiographs of untreated individuals (32 female, 18 males) was
obtained. Criteria for sample selection comprised were aged over 17 years, never
undergone orthodontic treatment, Makassarese and/or Buginese of ancestry, and the
presence of complete teeth from the left through the right first molars. The following
angular measurements were performed on lateral cephalograms: the skeletal
convexity degree (N-A-Pog) and the soft tissue convexity degree (n-no-pog), based on
the Subtelny’s analysis. The data was analyzed statistically by using independent t-test
and correlation test. The results were as the mean values of skeletal convexity degree
were 167.44º (male) and 166.53º (female), and the mean values of soft tissue convexity
degree were 159.05
o
(male) and 162.77
o
(female)Conclusion of the study is there was
a significant correlation between degree of skeletal and soft tissue convexity.

References

Jacobson A. Introduction to radiographic cephalometry. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. p. 14-59.

Fernandez P. Angular photogrammetic analysis of the soft tissue profile. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25: 393-9.

Purwanegara MK. Pengaruh penampilan kelainan dentofasial terhadap harga diri remaja awal [tesis]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 1985. p. 2.

Graber TM, Bedrich N. Removable orthodontic appliances. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Co.; 1984. p. 102.

Hamilah DK. Pola pertumbuhan jaringan lunak kraniofasial dan kaitannya dengan pola pertumbuhan jaringan keras kraniofasial dan pertumbuhan umum [tesis]. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti; 1991. p. 2-7.

Salzmann JA. Orthodontic in daily practice. Toronto: JP Lippincott Co.; 1974. p. 249-50.

Yusra Y, Widhayanti D, Widijanto S. Evaluasi jaringan lunak fasial Abang-None Jakarta Majalah Ilmiah Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas

Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Trisakti 2005; 59 (20):5-12.

Widhayanti D, Hamilah DK. Hubungan tipologi kraniofasial dengan maloklusi. Dalam Jurnal Persatuan Dokter Gigi Indonesia, Edisi Khusus Kongres Nasional PDGI XVIII Februari 1989. Ujung Pandang 1989. p. 148-9.

Mokhtar M. Dasar-dasar orthodonti: pertumbuhan dan perkembangan kraniofasial. Medan: Bina Insani Pustaka; 2002. p. 433. 10.Rakosi T. An atlas and manual of cephalometric radiography. London: Wolfe Med. Publ. Ltd.; 1982. p. 67-83.

Kusnoto H. Penggunaan radiografi sefalometrik pada rencana perawatan kasus kasus ortodontik. Simposia dan Temu Ilmiah Persatuan Dokter Gigi Indonesia. Semarang; 1989.

Yuniar ZM, Permana IM. Hubungan antara kenveksitas skeletal, posisi insisif dan posisi bibir pada penderita maloklusi. Komunikasi

Ilmu dan Teknologi Kedokteran Gigi (Abstrak). Bandung: Universitas Padjajaran; 2004. p. 46.


No Supplementary Material available for this article.
Article Views      : 617
PDF Downloads : 493