Hubungan antara derajat konveksitas profil jaringan keras dan jaringan lunak wajah pada suku Bugis dan Makassar
Abstract
One of the orthodontic treatment goals is to correct malocclusion in order to get ahealthy occlusion functionally and esthetically. Facial esthetics is greatly influencedby soft tissue facial profile. The aim of the study was to know the relationship betweenthe convexity degree of skeletal and soft tissue facial profiles. A sample of 50cephalometric radiographs of untreated individuals (32 female, 18 males) wasobtained. Criteria for sample selection comprised were aged over 17 years, neverundergone orthodontic treatment, Makassarese and/or Buginese of ancestry, and thepresence of complete teeth from the left through the right first molars. The followingangular measurements were performed on lateral cephalograms: the skeletalconvexity degree (N-A-Pog) and the soft tissue convexity degree (n-no-pog), based onthe Subtelny’s analysis. The data was analyzed statistically by using independent t-testand correlation test. The results were as the mean values of skeletal convexity degreewere 167.44º (male) and 166.53º (female), and the mean values of soft tissue convexitydegree were 159.05o(male) and 162.77o(female)Conclusion of the study is there wasa significant correlation between degree of skeletal and soft tissue convexity.
Section
References
- Jacobson A. Introduction to radiographic cephalometry. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1985. p. 14-59.
- Fernandez P. Angular photogrammetic analysis of the soft tissue profile. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25: 393-9.
- Purwanegara MK. Pengaruh penampilan kelainan dentofasial terhadap harga diri remaja awal [tesis]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 1985. p. 2.
- Graber TM, Bedrich N. Removable orthodontic appliances. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Co.; 1984. p. 102.
- Hamilah DK. Pola pertumbuhan jaringan lunak kraniofasial dan kaitannya dengan pola pertumbuhan jaringan keras kraniofasial dan pertumbuhan umum [tesis]. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti; 1991. p. 2-7.
- Salzmann JA. Orthodontic in daily practice. Toronto: JP Lippincott Co.; 1974. p. 249-50.
- Yusra Y, Widhayanti D, Widijanto S. Evaluasi jaringan lunak fasial Abang-None Jakarta Majalah Ilmiah Kedokteran Gigi Fakultas
- Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Trisakti 2005; 59 (20):5-12.
- Widhayanti D, Hamilah DK. Hubungan tipologi kraniofasial dengan maloklusi. Dalam Jurnal Persatuan Dokter Gigi Indonesia, Edisi Khusus Kongres Nasional PDGI XVIII Februari 1989. Ujung Pandang 1989. p. 148-9.
- Mokhtar M. Dasar-dasar orthodonti: pertumbuhan dan perkembangan kraniofasial. Medan: Bina Insani Pustaka; 2002. p. 433. 10.Rakosi T. An atlas and manual of cephalometric radiography. London: Wolfe Med. Publ. Ltd.; 1982. p. 67-83.
- Kusnoto H. Penggunaan radiografi sefalometrik pada rencana perawatan kasus kasus ortodontik. Simposia dan Temu Ilmiah Persatuan Dokter Gigi Indonesia. Semarang; 1989.
- Yuniar ZM, Permana IM. Hubungan antara kenveksitas skeletal, posisi insisif dan posisi bibir pada penderita maloklusi. Komunikasi
- Ilmu dan Teknologi Kedokteran Gigi (Abstrak). Bandung: Universitas Padjajaran; 2004. p. 46.
How to Cite
Susilowati, S. (2016). Hubungan antara derajat konveksitas profil jaringan keras dan jaringan lunak wajah pada suku Bugis dan Makassar. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 8(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v8i2.223
