Salivary pH changes post nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy using linac x- ray
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to obtain an illustration of saliva pH in patients undergoing radiotherapy with linac x-ray radiation for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma frequently caused severe salivary gland dysfunction. The salivary gland dysfunction possibly influenced saliva pH.Material and Methods: The study was a simple descriptive. This study was conducted on 7 males and 2 females undergoing radiation therapy with linac x-ray for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The measurement of saliva pH was done using an electrode pH meter.Results: This study shows that the range of saliva pH in 9 patients undergoing radiation therapy is 5.34 to 6.19.Conclusion: That saliva pH in 9 patients undergoing radiation therapy with linac x-ray radiation for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital is lower than its normal value.
Section
References
- Larry CC,Gerald FC, Bruce WT, et al. Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skina randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1996;276: 1957-1963.
- Noegroho HSY, Subita GP. Mempertahankan kualitas hidup pasien yang menjalani radioterapi pada kepala dan leher, JKGUI (Edisi khusus) 2003;10: 260-265.
- Susworo R. Kankernasofaring: epidemiologi dan pengobatan mutakhir. Cermin Dunia kedokteran 2004;144: 16-18.
- Stephen WK, Cheng MS, Albert CW, etal. Carotid s tenosis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126: 517-521.
- Sabrina S, Azhari A, Dudi A. DMF-T index in patients undergoing radiation therapy with LINAC X-ray radiation for head and neck cancer at Department of Radiotherapy, Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital. J Dent 2007;19: 156-161.
- Vissink A, Jansma J, Spijkervet FKL, et al. Oral squelae of head and neck radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2011:199-212
- Susworo R, Meidyawati R, Sasanti H. Penatalaksana anterapi radiasi pada keganasan rongga mulut. JKGUI (Edisi khusus) 2003;10: 989-994.
- Toto, Lia Y. Analisis aplikasi konsep gaya dalam fisika yang berkaitan dengan bidang biologi. JPPPF 2017;3: 63-72.
- Widyaputra S. Teori molekuler pertumbuhan kanker dan kaitannya dengan peningkatan terapi konvensional. JKG 1998;10: 33-36.
- Evans DB, Abbruzzese JLWCG. Cancer of the pancreas. J Pancreas 2011;12: 145-148.
- MA CM, Coffey CW, Dewerd LA, et al. AAPM protocol for 40–300 kV X-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. Med Physic 2001;28: 868-893.
- Robbins S, Kumar V. Basic Pathology. 9thed. Philadelphia: Elsevier;2013.
- Wenzel A. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions. J Dent Res 2004;83: 72-75.
- Beer KT, Zehnder D, Lussi A, et al. Saliva flow pH buffer capacity and colonization by streptococcus mutans during and after radical radiotherapy of head and neck tumours. Otorhino-laringol Nova 2002;3: 137-144.
- HornerK, Islam M, FlygareL, etal. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: c onsensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. DMFR 2009;38: 187-195.
- Redman RS. On approaches to the functional restoration of salivary glands damaged by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, with a review of related aspects of salivary gland morphology and development. Biotech Histochem 2008;83: 103-130.
- Mukhlis S, Amin Z, Ari K. Efektivitas fruit frozen t erhadap keluhan haus dan mulut kering pada pasien CHF yang menjalani program restriksi cairan di ruang UPJ RSUP Dr.Kariadi Semarang. Med Hosp 2014;2: 156-161.
- Naumova EA, Gaengler P, Zimmer S, et al. Influence of individual saliva secretion on fluoride bioavailability. 2010;4: 185-190.
- Yunus B. The prevalence of Xerostomia after doing radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer.J Dentomaxillofac Sci 2017;2: 12-14.
How to Cite
Azhari, A., Hutasoit, Y., Permana, A. C., & Soetopo, S. (2018). Salivary pH changes post nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy using linac x- ray. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 3(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v3i1.682