Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Calcium loss on root canal dentin after Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) application with different varians

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare calcium loss on root canal dentin before and after EDTA application with different varians and concentration with or without surfactant.Material and Methods: Samples are mandibular premolar teeth single root canal, which is divided into 4 groups: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) gel, cream, solution and negative control. They are decoronated in Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ), then prepared with Crown Down Pressureless (CDP) technique and separated bucolingual direction. One side was applied in EDTA according their respective groups and the other side was set as sample before application. Samples before and after application of each group are destructed then subsequently measured for their Ca2+’s amount using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry (AAS). Data were collected and analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey Post Hoc test.Results: This showed significant differences between Ca2+ amount in root canal dentin before and after application either on EDTA gel, cream, or solution as well as on negative control group (p<0.05).Conclusion: Application of EDTA solution causes the highest calcium loss compared to EDTA gel and cream.
Section

References

  1. Torabinejad M, Rivera EM. Cleaning and shaping. In: Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Principles and practice of endodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier. 2009. p. 206.
  2. Cohen S, Hargreaves K. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2006. p. 179.
  3. Krasner P, Rankow HJ, Abrams ES. Access opening and canal location. In: Endodontics colleagues for excellence. Chicago: Am Assoc Endod. 2010.
  4. Ford TR. Endodontics: problem solving in clinical practice. 2003. p. 97-102.
  5. Tartari T, Souza P, Almeida B, et al. A new weak chelator in endodontics: effects of different irrigation regimens with etidronate on root dentin microhardness. Int J of Dent 2013;743018: 1-5.
  6. Cobankara FK, Erdogan H, Hamurcu M. Effects of chelating agents on the mineral content of root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112: e149-154.
  7. Kamakshi, Suvarna N, Shetty HK, et al. Relation between calcium loss and its effect on microhardness root canal dentin following treatment with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic ecid (EDTA) at different time interval: an ex-vivo study. J Int Med and Dent 2014;1: 75-78.
  8. Qian W, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Quantitative analysis of the effect of irrigant solution sequences on dentin erosion. J Endod 2011;37: 1437-1441.
  9. Turk T, Kaval ME, Sen BH. Evaluation of the smear layer removal and erosive capacity of EDTA, boric acid, citrid acid and desy clean solution: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2015;15: 1-5.
  10. Machado-Silveiro LH, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Gonzalez-Rodriguez MP. Decalcification of root canal dentin by citric acid, EDTA and sodium citrate. Int Endo J 2004;37: 365-369.
  11. Napte BG, Srinidhi SR. Evaluation of the action of chelating agents of the microhardness of superficial layer of root canal lumen dentin. World J Dent 2014;5: 124-128.
  12. Kalluru R, Kumar ND, Ahmed S, et al. Comparative evalution of the effect of EDTA, EDTAC, NaOCl, and MTAD on microhardness of human dentin-an invitro study. J Clin & Diag Res 2014;8: 39-41.
  13. Bagmar S. Effect of different surfactant addition to edta on microhardness of root dentin: an in vitro study. Int J Res Dent 2013;3: 120-124.
  14. Handa A, Handa RS. Influence of root canal irrigants on dental tissues: a review of literature. Indian J Dent Sci 2013;5: 73-75.
  15. Ali SG, Mulay S. Effect of EDTA-urea peroxide combination at different time periods on smear layer and root dentin surface: a sem study. Int J Innov & App Studies 2014;8: 232-235.

How to Cite

Nugroho, J. J., Rovani, C. A., Daharuddin, H., Trilaksana, A. C., Natsir, N., & Sumidarti, A. (2019). Calcium loss on root canal dentin after Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) application with different varians. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 4(2), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v4i2.781

HTML
568

Total
494

Share

Search Panel

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>