Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of 2% glutaraldehyde and 4.8% chloroxylenol on tooth extraction instruments in the Department of Oral Maxillofacial and Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of North Sumatera

  • Ahyar Riza ,
  • Indra B. Siregar ,
  • Isnandar Isnandar ,
  • Bernard Bernard ,

Abstract

Objective: To compare disinfecting effectiveness of 2% glutaraldehyde and 4.8% chloroxylenol on tooth extraction instruments at the Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara.Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with post-test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are lower molar extraction forceps. In this study, sample were divided into 2 groups and each consisting of 18 instruments. The treatment group was treated with 2% glutaraldehyde while the control group was treated with 4.8% chloroxylenol. Each instrument was pre-cleaned using a brush, water and soap for both groups underwent the disinfection process.Results: The results were statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. The comparison between glutaraldehyde and chloroxylenol showed a significant difference to the total bacteria count on instrument after disinfection (p=0.014 < 0.05).Conclusion: 2% glutaraldehyde was more effective than 4.8% chloroxylenol at disinfecting lower molar extraction forceps.
Section

References

  1. Jacob MTC. Biofilms, a new approach to the microbiology of dental plaque. Odontol 2006;94: 1-9
  2. Suleh MM, Vowor VNS, Mintjelungan CN. Pencegahan dan pengendalian infeksi silang pada tindakan ekstraksi gigi di rumah sakit gigi dan mulut pspdg fk unsrat. J e-Gigi (eG) 2015;3: 587-588.
  3. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Disinfection and sterilization: an overview. American J Infection Control 2013;41: S2-S5.
  4. Almeida CMF, Carvalho AS, Duarte DA. Evaluation of disinfection methods of orthodontic pliers. Dental Press J Orthod 2012;17: 106-109.
  5. Juan MR, Herrin A, Concert C, et al. Guideline for use of high-level disinfectants & sterilants for reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes. Chicago: SGNA; 2013. p. 9-12.
  6. Marsh PD. Controlling the oral biofilm with antimicrobials. J Dentist 2010;38: S11-S15.
  7. Ochie K, Ohagwu CC. Contamination of x-ray equipment and accessories with nosocomial bacteria and the effectiveness of common disinfecting agent. African J Basic & Appl Sci 2009;1: 31-35.
  8. Venkatesh SP, Kuthandapani S, Marudavanan R, et al. A comparative study of efficacy of disinfectants used for flexible endoscopes: glutaraldehyde versus ortho-phthalaldehyde. Sch J App Med Sci 2014;2: 1408-1412.
  9. El-Mahmood AM, Doughari JH. Effect of Dettol on viability of some microorganisms associated with nosocomial infections. African J Biotechnol 2008;7: 1554-1562.
  10. Thaweboon S, Thaweboon B. In vitro antimicrobial activity of ocimum americanum l. essential oil against oral microorganism. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2009;40: 1025-1033.
  11. Takahashi N, Nyvad B. The role of bacteria in the caries process: ecological perspectives. J Dent Res 2011;90: 294-303.
  12. Robertson D, Smith AJ. The microbiology of the acute dental abscess. J Med Microbiol 2009;58: 155-162.

How to Cite

Riza, A., Siregar, I. B., Isnandar, I., & Bernard, B. (2018). Comparison of effectiveness disinfection of 2% glutaraldehyde and 4.8% chloroxylenol on tooth extraction instruments in the Department of Oral Maxillofacial and Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of North Sumatera. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 3(3), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v3i3.794

HTML
581

Total
624

Share

Search Panel

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>