Original Article

Comparison between effectivity of povidone Iodin 1% application with swab technique and rinse to the number of bacteria colonization as an aseptic action in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Isnandar Isnandar , Hendry Rusdy, Indra B. Siregar, Nur Syamimi

Isnandar Isnandar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia. Email: isnandar@usu.ac.id

Hendry Rusdy
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Indra B. Siregar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Nur Syamimi
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Online First: August 01, 2020 | Cite this Article
Isnandar, I., Rusdy, H., Siregar, I., Syamimi, N. 2020. Comparison between effectivity of povidone Iodin 1% application with swab technique and rinse to the number of bacteria colonization as an aseptic action in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 5(2): 90-93. DOI:10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.848


Objective: To compare between Effectivity of Povidone Iodin 1% Application With Swab Technique and Rinse To the Number of Bacteria Colonization As An Aseptic Action at the department of oral surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Material and  Methods: This was an experimental study with post-test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 4 groups and each consisting of 10 people. The sample was divided into negative control group with 0.9% normal saline and 1% povidone iodine treatment group with two techniques which is swab and gargle.

Results: Based on Mann-Whitney test result on 1% Povidone Iodin group which was rinse and  swab technique obtained p-value = 0.382 where p-value > 0,05 so it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between 1 % Povidone Iodine in rinsing technique and 1% Povidone Iodine in swabbing.

Conclusion: Rinsing was more effective than swab as an aseptic action with 1% Povidone Iodine.

References

Suleh MM, Wowor VNS, Mintjelungan CN. Prevention

and control of cross infection in the extraction of teeth

in the Dental and Oral Hospital of PSPDG FK UNSRAT.

J e-Gigi(eG) 2015;3: 587-588. (In Indonesia)

Kosutic D, Uglesic V, Perkovic D, et al. Preoperative

antiseptics in clean/contaminated maxillofacial and oral

surgery: prospective randomized study’. Int J Oral &

Maxillofac Surg 2009;38: 160-162.

Mervrayano J, Rahmatini, Bahar E. Comparison of the

effectiveness of mouthwash containing chlorhexidine and

povidone iodine against streptococus mutans. J Kesehatan

Andalas 2015;1: 169. (In Indonesia)

Johnson NR, Kazoulis A, Bobinskas AM. Bacterial

comparison of preoperative rinsing and swabbing for

oral surgery using 0.2% chlorhexidine. J Investig & Clin

Dent 2015;6: 193-194.

Scannapieco FA, Yu J, Raghavendran K. A randomized

trial of chlorhexidine gluconate on oral bacterial

pathogens in mechanically ventilated patients. 2009;13: 4.

Cappucino JG, Welsh C. Microbiology: a laboratory

manual. 11th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited;

p. 20-33.

Patabang WA, Leman MA, Maryono J. The difference in

the growth of the number of oral bacterial colonies before

and after using mouthwash containing chlorhexidine.

J Ilmiah Farmasi 2016;5: 27-28. (In Indonesia)

Marsh PD, Martin MV. Oral microbiology Fifth Edition.

London New York: Elsevier; 2009. p. 8.

Riza A, Siregar IB, Isnandar, et al. Comparison of

effectiveness disinfection of 2% glutaraldehyde and 4.8%

chloroxylenol on tooth extraction instruments in the

Department of Oral Maxillofacial and Surgery, Faculty of

Dentistry, University of North Sumatera. J Dentomaxillofac

Sci 2018;3: 169-171.


No Supplementary Material available for this article.
Article Views      : 112
PDF Downloads : 15