Comparison between effectivity of povidone Iodin 1% application with swab technique and rinse to the number of bacteria colonization as an aseptic action in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara
Abstract
Objective: To compare between Effectivity of Povidone Iodin 1% Application With Swab Technique and Rinse To the Number of Bacteria Colonization As An Aseptic Action at the department of oral surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara.Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with post-test only control group design approach. Purposive technique is applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 4 groups and each consisting of 10 people. The sample was divided into negative control group with 0.9% normal saline and 1% povidone iodine treatment group with two techniques which is swab and gargle.Results: Based on Mann-Whitney test result on 1% Povidone Iodin group which was rinse and swab technique obtained p-value = 0.382 where p-value > 0,05 so it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between 1 % Povidone Iodine in rinsing technique and 1% Povidone Iodine in swabbing.Conclusion: Rinsing was more effective than swab as an aseptic action with 1% Povidone Iodine.
Section
References
- Suleh MM, Wowor VNS, Mintjelungan CN. Prevention
- and control of cross infection in the extraction of teeth
- in the Dental and Oral Hospital of PSPDG FK UNSRAT.
- J e-Gigi(eG) 2015;3: 587-588. (In Indonesia)
- Kosutic D, Uglesic V, Perkovic D, et al. Preoperative
- antiseptics in clean/contaminated maxillofacial and oral
- surgery: prospective randomized study’. Int J Oral &
- Maxillofac Surg 2009;38: 160-162.
- Mervrayano J, Rahmatini, Bahar E. Comparison of the
- effectiveness of mouthwash containing chlorhexidine and
- povidone iodine against streptococus mutans. J Kesehatan
- Andalas 2015;1: 169. (In Indonesia)
- Johnson NR, Kazoulis A, Bobinskas AM. Bacterial
- comparison of preoperative rinsing and swabbing for
- oral surgery using 0.2% chlorhexidine. J Investig & Clin
- Dent 2015;6: 193-194.
- Scannapieco FA, Yu J, Raghavendran K. A randomized
- trial of chlorhexidine gluconate on oral bacterial
- pathogens in mechanically ventilated patients. 2009;13: 4.
- Cappucino JG, Welsh C. Microbiology: a laboratory
- manual. 11th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited;
- p. 20-33.
- Patabang WA, Leman MA, Maryono J. The difference in
- the growth of the number of oral bacterial colonies before
- and after using mouthwash containing chlorhexidine.
- J Ilmiah Farmasi 2016;5: 27-28. (In Indonesia)
- Marsh PD, Martin MV. Oral microbiology Fifth Edition.
- London New York: Elsevier; 2009. p. 8.
- Riza A, Siregar IB, Isnandar, et al. Comparison of
- effectiveness disinfection of 2% glutaraldehyde and 4.8%
- chloroxylenol on tooth extraction instruments in the
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial and Surgery, Faculty of
- Dentistry, University of North Sumatera. J Dentomaxillofac
- Sci 2018;3: 169-171.
How to Cite
Isnandar, Rusdy, H., Siregar, I. B., & Syamimi, N. (2020). Comparison between effectivity of povidone Iodin 1% application with swab technique and rinse to the number of bacteria colonization as an aseptic action in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 5(2), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.848
