Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Association between caries status and quality of life of adults in Pinrang, 2019

  • Rasmidar Samad ,

Abstract

Objective: To analyzeassociation between caries status and quality of life of adult in Pinrang, 2019; promoting epidemiology data in planning and evaluation of oral health care programs. Material and Methods: This study used pilot pathfinder design. The subject compromised of 345 subjects aged ≥ 18 years old and randomly selected from urban and rural areas in Pinrang, Indonesia. The data were collected by 194 subject from urban area and 151 subject from rural areas. We used DMF-T index according to WHO methodology and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire translated to Bahasa (Indonesia version). Results: Based on gender, DMF-T index of males was lower than females in urban areas, whereas DMF-T index of males was higher than women in rural areas. In urban and rural areas, the mean of F (filled) component was 0.00. The highest DMF-T index was at subjects aged > 60 years, 17.19 in urban areas and 16.52 in rural areas, respectively. There was no significant association between caries status and quality of life both in urban and rural areas in subjects aged 18-44 years old (p > 0.05). As for subjects aged ≥ 45 years in urban areas, it was observed that there was a significant relationship between caries status and the quality of life (p <0.05).Conclusion: There was no significant association between caries status aged 18-44 years and quality of life in urban and rural areas. In adults aged ≥ 45 years, the results showed that there was no significant association between caries status and quality of life of adults in rural areas and a significant association between caries status and the quality of life of adults in urban areas.
Section

References

  1. Husain FA, Tatengkeng F. Oral health-related quality
  2. of life appraised by OHIP-14 between urban and rural
  3. areas inKutaiKartanegara Regency, Indonesia: pilot
  4. pathfinder survey. Open Dent J 2017;11: 557-564.
  5. Bennadi D, CVK Reddy. Oral health related quality of
  6. life. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2013;3: 1-6.
  7. Agustina D, Hanindriyo L, Widita E, et al. The correlation
  8. between occurrence of dental caries and oral healthrelated
  9. quality of life (OHRQoL) of elderly population
  10. in Yogyakarta special region. J Med Sci 2018;50: 191-200.
  11. Papaioannou W, Oulis CJ, Latsou D, et al. Oral healthrealated
  12. quality of life of greek adults: a cross-sectional
  13. study. Int J Dentistry 2011;1: 1-7.
  14. Drachev SN, Brenn T, Trovik TA. Oral health-related
  15. quality of life in young adults: a survey of Russian
  16. undergraduate students. Int J Environ Res Public Health
  17. ;15: 1-13.
  18. Sheng X, Xiao X, Song X, et al. Correlation between
  19. oral health and quality of life among the elderly in
  20. Southwest China from 2013 to 2015. Med 2018:97: 1-7.
  21. Soekanto SA, Fadillah F, Nuraisiya P, et al. The potentioal
  22. of several fluoride-based varnishes as remineralization
  23. agents: morphological studies, dentin surface hardness,
  24. and crystallinity tests. Int J Applied Pharm 2019;9: 60-66.
  25. Faranitha R, Muhibat SS, Suyanti N. Perbedaan indeks
  26. DMF-T antara siswa SMP di perkotaandanperdesaanusia
  27. -13 tahun. J Ked Gi Unpad 2016;28: 176-184.
  28. Badan Pusat Statistik. Kabupaten Pinrang dalam angka
  29. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Pinranng. ISSN:
  30. -4312
  31. Braga MM, Oliveira LB, Bonini GA, et al. Feasibility
  32. of the International Caries Detection and Assessment
  33. System (ICDAS-II) in epidemiologicalsurveys and
  34. comparability with standard World Health Organization
  35. criteria. Caries Res 2009;43: 245-249.
  36. Gatten DL, Riedy CA, Hong SK, et al. Quality of life
  37. endodotically treated versus implat treated patients: a
  38. university-based qualitative research study. J Endo
  39. ;37: 903-909.
  40. Xavier A, CarvalhoESd, BastosRdS, et al. Impact of
  41. dental caries on quality of life of Young adults according
  42. to access to oral health services: a cross sectional study.
  43. Braz J Oral Scl 2016;15: 1-7.
  44. Anwar AI. Correlation between mental health and caries
  45. status in Primary School students. J Dentomaxillofac
  46. Sci 2018;3: 108-111.
  47. Abhishek KN, Shamarao S, Jain J, et al. Impact of
  48. caries prevalence on oral health-related quality of life
  49. among police personel in Virajpet, South India. J Int
  50. Soc Prev Community Dent 2014;4: 188-192.
  51. SoaresJdSP, Santos LPdS, Cruz SSd, et al. The impact
  52. of caries in combination with periodontitis on oral
  53. health-related quality of life in Bahia, Brazil. J Perio
  54. ;89: 1407-1417.
  55. Demirci M, Ulu T, Yildiz E, et al. Influence of age,
  56. sex and socioeconomic factors on dental health. Balk J
  57. Stoma 2009;13: 105-110.
  58. Verenne B, Petersen PE, Ouattara S. Oral health status
  59. of children and adults in urban and rural areas of
  60. Bukina Faso, Africa. Int Dent J 2004;54: 83-89.
  61. Palma PV, Caetano PL, Leite ICG. Impact of periodontal
  62. diseases on health-related quality of life of users of the
  63. Brazilian Unified Health System. Int J Dent 2013;1:
  64. -6.
  65. Bastos RS, Carvalho ES, Xavier A, et al. Dental caries
  66. related to quality of life in two Brazilian adolescent
  67. group: a cross sectional study. Int Dent J 2012;62:
  68. -143.
  69. Takeuchi MY, Ekuni D, Mizutani S, et al. Association
  70. among oral health-related quality of life, subjective
  71. symptoms, clinical status, and self-rated oral health in
  72. Japanese university students: a cross sectional study.
  73. BMC Oral Health 2016;16: 1-7.

How to Cite

Samad, R. (2019). Association between caries status and quality of life of adults in Pinrang, 2019. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 4(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v4i2.938

HTML
437

Total
564

Share

Search Panel

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>